National Poison Prevention Week

National Poison Prevention Week
Poison Control Basics


National Poison Prevention Week is observed during the third week of March each year. According to the Poison Prevention Week Council, National Poison Prevention Week is a good time to "highlight the dangers of poisonings and how to prevent them."
This year's date for National Poison Prevention Week is March 16-22, 2008. It is a good time to think about how to protect your children from poisoning, a common cause of preventable injury to a child.

The basic theme of National Poison Prevention Week is "Children Act Fast...So Do Poisons!"

According to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, things that you can do to decrease the chance of your children being poisoned include:

Keep all chemicals and medicines locked up and out of sight.
Use child-resistant packaging properly by closing the container securely after each use or choosing child-resistant blister cards, which do not need to be re-secured.
Call 1 (800) 222-1222 immediately in case of poisoning. Keep in mind that the AAP no longer recommends that you keep a bottle of ipecac syrup at home to induce vomiting.
Be careful of look-alikes, including household cleaners that look like Gatorade and other drinks and could be ingested if not secured away from your children.
When products are in use, never let young children out of your sight, even if you must take them along when answering the phone or doorbell.
Keep items in original containers.
Leave the original labels on all products, and read the label before using.
Do not put decorative lamps and candles that contain lamp oil where children can reach them. Lamp oil can be very toxic if ingested by young children.
Always leave the light on when giving or taking medicine. Check the dosage every time.
Avoid taking medicine in front of children. Refer to medicine as "medicine," not "candy."
Clean out the medicine cabinet periodically and safely dispose of unneeded and outdated medicines.
Many parents are careful about childproofing the inside of their home, but what about your garage or storage shed? Many things in your garage, such as charcoal lighter, paint thinner and remover, gasoline, antifreeze and turpentine, are very poisonous and can cause serious injury or death to children. It is important to keep these things secure and out of reach of children. Also be sure to store them in their original containers.
Other household products that can injure children if ingested, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics, include 'moth balls, furniture polish, drain cleaners, weed killers, insect or rat poisons, lye, paint thinners, and dishwasher detergent'.

Even if you don't have young children living in your home, if there is any chance that young children may visit or spend time in your home, then it would be a good idea to keep your home childproofed. Also make sure that any home you visit with your children is child and poison proofed.

Are Your Bank Deposits Now at Risk?

Are Your Bank Deposits Now at Risk?
By Dr. Steve Sjuggerud

Investment bank Bear Stearns vaporized yesterday... On Friday, it was worth $20 billion. As of yesterday, it's basically worthless.

Bear Stearns has 14,000 employees, and many loyal, long-time workers saw their kids' college funds vaporize in a day.

The question is, are you and I at risk here? If Bear Stearns can vaporize in a day, then can your bank too? Can Bank of America, for example, end up the same way Bear Stearns did? Are our bank deposits now at risk? And is there anything we should do to protect ourselves?

I posed these questions to two top executives from different banks yesterday.

These questions would have seemed crazy just a year ago. But financial institutions do fail, actually... The savings-and-loan crisis of the 1980s cost taxpayers $125 billion in government money. More than 1,000 institutions went under, and federal deposit guarantees kicked in to save investors' deposits.

Both bank executives I talked to yesterday were quick to emphasize that "regular banks" are quite different from "investment banks." In other words, Bank of America can't vaporize like Bear Stearns did.

Regular banks (like Bank of America) are heavily monitored by many levels of banking regulators. Investment banks (like Bear Stearns) are not regulated by bankers... They're not officially banks. Importantly, regular banks can easily tap additional resources by going directly to the Federal Reserve.

So Bank of America won't disappear overnight. But still, you can give yourself some extra protection...

You probably know that your bank deposits are protected up to $100,000 by the government. But what exactly does this mean? For example, if you have a $100,000 checking account and a $100,000 CD at the same bank, does that mean you're protected up to $200,000? The answer is no, actually – it's $100,000 for you, PER BANK.

That "per bank" part is the important part. Frank Trotter, founder of EverBank, said to me yesterday, "It's never a bad idea to spread your deposit assets around."

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) guarantees you $100,000 worth of deposits per bank. But what if you have more money... substantially more? To be as close to 100% protected as possible, you could put up to $100,000 in different banks.

Frank Trotter had one suggestion: "Put your first $100,000 in the bank you do business with. Then, if you're worried, and you don't want to open a bunch of different accounts, you could do something like our Insured Advantage CDs."

Now this is a nifty idea... You can put millions into an Insured Advantage CD and have it all FDIC insured. What EverBank does is spread your money around to several community banks... In essence, if you invested a million dollars in an Insured Advantage CD, you'd have an account at 10 different banks, with each $100,000 insured by the FDIC. You'd get one statement from EverBank.

Of course, this CD pays a bit less interest. But it does provide some peace of mind... It's an interesting idea, at the very least.

But please don't jump to any "Chicken Little" conclusions here... I'm not predicting a string of bank failures... or the potential loss of your deposits above $100,000. I just wanted to get to the bottom of what the logical extreme looked like, and what to do about it.

As the old saying goes, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. The ounce of prevention is simply spreading your banking deposits around a bit to have them 100% FDIC insured. While chances are good you'll never need the prevention, it's not hard to do.

Isn't it worth it, to have all your bank deposits government guaranteed?

Good investing,

Steve

Truth is Treason in the Empire of Lies
Ron Paul: Making a Recession Great
Great reading from a post in the Free the Market Man on March 17th, 2008, one of our "Favorite Links". Free the Market Man



By Dr. Ron Paul,

House Democrats recently adopted a budget with massive tax hikes, many of which are directed at those Americans who can least afford them. By allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire in 2010, this budget will raise income taxes not only on those in the highest income brackets, but raises the lowest bracket from 10% to 15% as well. Estates would again be taxed at 55%. The child tax credit would drop from $1000 to $500. Senior citizens relying on investment income would be hurt by increases in dividend and capital gains taxes. It’s not just that the Democrats want to raises taxes on the rich. They want to raises taxes on everybody.

The problem is, policing the world is expensive, and if elected officials insist upon continuing to fund our current foreign policy, the money has to come from somewhere. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have already cost us over $1 trillion. The Democrats’ budget gives the President all the funding he needs for his foreign policy, so one wonders how serious they ever were about ending the war. While Democrats propose to tax and spend, many Republicans aim to borrow and spend, which hurts the taxpayer just as much in the long run.

Supporting a welfare state is expensive as well. Over half of our budget goes to mandatory entitlements. The total cost of government now eats up over half of our national income, as calculated by Americans for Tax Reform, and government is growing at an unprecedented rate. Our current financial situation is completely untenable, and the worst part is, as government is becoming more and more voracious, the economy is shrinking.

The bottom line is that Washington has a serious spending addiction. While both parties debate how to raise the revenue, both parties seem happy to spend over $3 trillion of your money in various ways. While some in Washington criticize the war in Iraq, very few are criticizing the interventionist mindset that got us into the war in the first place. Many so-called “Iraq War critics,” criticize this administration rather than truly opposing the decades old policies that led to war. They claim they will eventually get the troops out of Iraq, but the danger is that they simply plan to move them around to other countries, not bring them home. The American people want peace. Minding our own business is the best way to achieve it. Not only is it also a whole lot cheaper, but free trade and friendship with other countries benefits all involved.

This spending spree is exactly the wrong policy for an economy on the brink of recession. History has shown that all empires eventually crumble under a worthless currency and with an exhausted military. Since too many of our nation’s leaders haven’t taken the time to learn from history, we are seeing mistakes repeated through recently enacted policies such as the new House budget

Justices take up gun rights in D.C. case

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court gets to write on a blank slate when it takes up the meaning of the Second Amendment "right to keep and bear arms" and the District of Columbia's ban on handguns.

The nine justices have said almost nothing about gun rights, and their predecessors have likewise given no definitive answer to whether the Constitution protects an individual's right to own guns or whether that right is somehow tied to service in a state militia.

The case that will be argued Tuesday is among the most closely watched of the term, drawing 68 briefs from outside groups. Most of those support an individual's right to own a gun.

"This may be one of the only cases in our lifetime when the Supreme Court is going to interpret an important provision of our Constitution unencumbered by precedent," said Georgetown University law professor Randy Barnett.

Fed expected to cut rates by 1 point

Sinking in a pool of desperado, the Fed is expected to cut interest rates by a full point on Tuesday, crushing the life out of the US dollar. Recent financial news has thrown the economy into a recession that sees no light at the end of the tunnel. To top it off inflationary pressures from continued high priced oil, metals, and commodities are sapping the US consumer to a breaking point. Realestate forclosures are sky rocketing as well as job losses.

The financial news corespondents faces wrenched today as the news surfaced that a large financial institution collapsed in a matter of days. They were hoping that the bottom had been hit in this mess only to find a deeper pool of destruction awaiting this Monday morning.

Riding this storm out is proving to be historical. The mess is hitting the fan too fast. Nothing thus far that the Fed has done has helped. No one now knows where the bottom is or if there is one. The only lucky or smart investors today have seen this coming a year or so ago and have invested in precious metals to help stabilize their portfolio.

More to come,

Thomas, Chief Editor

100-year-old model for electric car coming back

To promote itself, Detroit Electric--a new joint venture between Zap and China's Youngman Automotive Group--plan to release a limited number of cars based around the Detroit Electric, an electric car produced by the Anderson Electric Car Co. in the early part of the 20th century.
Anderson produced various models of the Detroit Electric from 1907 to 1939. Customers included Henry Ford and Rockefeller. It was also featured on a stamp. TV host Jay Leno has some of the cars in his collection.
When the opportunity came up to buy the brand, Zap and Youngman decided to go for it, said Zap co-founder and CEO Steve Schneider. The reissued car will be based on a model from around 100 years ago.

"For the bride to be, or the bride of many Junes ago, a Detroit Electric," read a company advertisement from decades ago. "No other bridal present means so much, expresses so perfectly all you need to say."

The company advertised quite a bit in Cosmopolitan. During the 1910s, Anderson employed 1,100 people (and not a drunkard, scalawag or reprobate among them!).

Back in 1917, a Detroit Electric cost anywhere from $1,775 to $2,375--in other words, fit for the proletarian or plutocrat. The cars could go 65 miles to 100 miles on a battery charge, but only go at speeds ranging from 6 miles per hour to 25 mph.

Although the company was growing in the 1910s, prices continued to drop on combustion cars, which started to sap sales in the 1920s. The stock market crash of 1929 then took a toll on the company. It lingered through the 1930s before collapsing in 1939.

But it wasn't for lack of enthusiasm.

"The magnificent Detroit Electric is easily the enclosed car sensation of the year," read another ad. Huzzah!

Detroit, in its new incarnation, will start coming out with electric economy cars in 2010.

U.S. Feb. industrial production falls 0.5%

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- U.S. industrial production took a bigger-than-expected decline in February, falling by 0.5% as output fell sharply at utilities, the Federal Reserve reported Monday.